Institutional Support, Teacher Sustainability, and Student English Learning Motivation: A Small Scale Cross Cultural Comparison of China and Latvia
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.67148/fahss-2026-182关键词:
institutional support, teacher sustainability, English learning motivation, cross cultural comparison, secondary education摘要
Teacher wellbeing and student motivation are both critical concerns in language education, yet they are often treated separately. This smallscale crosscultural study investigates whether teacher sustainability mediates the relationship between institutional support and student motivation to learn English. Data were collected from two distinct instructional contexts -- China (EFL) and Latvia (ESLlike) -- via a crosssectional survey of 150 teacher--student dyads (China: *n* = 80; Latvia: *n* = 70) from secondary English classrooms. Mediation was tested using bootstrapped regression, and crosscultural differences in path coefficients were examined with interaction terms.Results indicate that institutional support positively predicts teacher sustainability, which in turn positively predicts student English motivation. In both countries, teacher sustainability fully mediates the link between support and motivation. Regarding crosscultural patterns, the mediation structure remains invariant, yet the strength of the supporttosustainability path is significantly larger in Latvia (β = 0.59) than in China (β = 0.42). This difference appears to be driven by Latvian teachers' stronger positive response to autonomy support, whereas Chinese teachers place relatively greater value on administrative efficiency.Despite the modest sample size, these findings point to a universal pathway from school support to student engagement via teacher sustainability, while also revealing culturally sensitive leverage points. Implications for English language policy and teacher development are discussed.
参考
[1] Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
[2] Hiver, P., AlHoorie, A. H., & Mercer, S. (Eds.). (2021). Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters.
[3] Hiver, P. (2017). Tracing the signature dynamics of language teacher immunity: A retrodictive qualitative modeling study. The Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 669–690.
[4] OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
[5] Ministry of Education of Latvia. (2024). Education in Latvia: Key indicators and developments. Riga.
[6] Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
[7] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Selfdetermination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
[8] Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Multilingual Matters.
[9] Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher selfefficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160.
[10] Wang, H., & Hall, N. C. (2019). A crosscultural study of teacher emotions: The role of controlvalue appraisals. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102898.
[11] Silova, I., & Palandjian, G. (2018). PostSoviet education. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press.
[12] Frenzel, A. C., BeckerKurz, B., & Pekrun, R. (2018). Teacher emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. LinnenbrinkGarcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 494–511). Routledge.
[13] Hiver, P. (2017). Tracing the signature dynamics of language teacher immunity: A retrodictive qualitative modeling study. The Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 669–690.
[14] van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for crosscultural research. Sage.
[15] Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507.
[16] Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2015). School climate and socialemotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189–1204.
[17] Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., GonzálezRomá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.
[18] Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017.
[19] Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
##submission.downloads##
已出版
##submission.howToCite##
期
栏目
##submission.license##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##For all articles published in Axon Academic Publishing Institute journals, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download, read, reuse, and quote the paper for free, provided that the original published version is cited. This ensures that the work receives maximum use and exposure, while giving proper credit to the authors.
In exceptional circumstances, articles may be licensed differently. If you have specific conditions (such as those related to funding) that prevent using this license, please notify the journal’s editorial office during submission. Exceptions will be considered at the publisher's discretion.
