数字鸿沟、乡土文化与自然保护地评价体系重构

Authors

  • 陈颐 闽江大学
  • 江诗琪 福建江夏学院

Keywords:

数字鸿沟;乡土文化;自然保护地评价体系

Abstract

自然保护地评价对推进自然生态保护、维系国家自然文化脉络、提升社会福祉具有重要的指导意义与预警作用。本文以数字鸿沟的弥合需求与中国乡土文化的赋能价值为切入点,采用因子分析构建自然保护地评估体系,为自然保护地的生态保护、经济发展与社区协同提供理论支撑与实践路径。研究结果如下:(1)在已有评价体系的基础上,构建了一个能够反映中国本土文化和数字经济时代需求的自然保护地评价体系,通过因子分析提取主成分、熵权法赋予各指标权重,形成兼具生态导向、人力-技能驱动、数字鸿沟与文化赋能的评价体系,为自然保护地评价提供了一个新的框架。(2)应用该体系对福建省18个代表性保护地进行评价发现,武夷山国家公园、梅花山国家级自然保护区、闽江河口湿地位列前三,主要优势在于生态基础扎实、人力资本和数字技能驱动能力强;而闽西部分省级自然保护地短板集中在数字鸿沟与文化赋能两个维度。本文对自然保护地评价体系的重构与优化,可为自然保护地的合理评估提供理论支撑与实践路径;能够更精准地反映自然保护地的建设成效,有助于引导相关部门聚焦核心权责、提升工作质量,实现自然保护地在生态保护、人口就业、文化传承等方面的高质量发展。

References

[1]BekKuqi, Laji L .The Importance of Ecotourism Development in Kosovo National Park[J].Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 2025, 7(5):424-433.

[2]于超月,高阳,王晨旭,等. 人地耦合视角下中国自然保护地有效性评估研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2022,41(11):2178-2190.

[3]侯鹏,付卓,周海丽,等.自然保护地监测评估技术体系构建及业务化运行机制研究[J].环境保护,2025,53(15):19-22.

[4]林雅莉,范少贞,廖凌云,等. 福建省自然保护地管理有效性评估——基于保护地快速评估和优先性确定方法 [J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42 (08): 3119-3133.

[5]Van d P T L , Alexander D G , Pocock M J O .Monitoring protected areas by integrating machine learning, remote sensing and citizen science[J].Ecological Solutions & Evidence, 2025, 6(2):1.

[6]费孝通. 文化的生与死[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社,2009.

[7]Acreman M , Hughes K A , Arthington A H ,et al.Protected areas and freshwater biodiversity: a novel systematic review distils eight lessons for effective conservation[J].Conservation Letters, 2020, 13(1):1-14.

[8]Di Minin E , Slotow R , Hunter L T B ,et al.Global priorities for national carnivore conservation under land use change[J].Scientific Reports, 2016, 6:23814.DOI:10.1038/srep23814.

[9]Jones, K. R., Venter, O., Fuller, R. A., Allan, J. R., Maxwell, S. L., Negret, P. J., & Watson, J. E. (2018). One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science, 360(6390), 788-791.

[10]Araujo A A D , Silva J M ,Rosngela Gouvêa Pinto,et al.Analysis of sustainability indicators for the conservation unit[J].Concilium, 2023, 23(15):363-379.DOI:10.53660/clm-1716-23l29.

[11]Stigner, M. G., Beyer, H. L., Klein, C. J., & Fuller, R. A. (2016). Reconciling recreational use and conservation values in a coastal protected area. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53(4), 1206-1214.

[12]Terraube J , Doninck J V , Helle P ,et al.Assessing the effectiveness of a national protected area network for carnivore conservation[J].Nature Publishing Group, 2020.DOI:10.1038/S41467-020-16792-7.

[13]Lauren,Coad,Fiona,et al.Measuring impact of protected area management interventions: current and future use of the Global Database of Protected Area Management Effectiveness.[J].Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015, 370 (1681): 20140281.

[14]Nightingale J , Gill J A , Porisson B ,et al.Conservation beyond Boundaries: using animal movement networks in Protected Area assessment[J].Animal Conservation, 2023(6):26.

[15]Hoffmann D , Vasconcelos M F , Martins R .How climate change can affect the distribution range and conservation status of an endemic bird from the highlands of eastern Brazil: the case of the Gray-backed Tachuri, Polystictus superciliaris (Aves, Tyrannidae)[J].Biota Neotropica, 2015, 15:1-12.

[16]David Rodríguez-Rodríguez,Javier Martínez-Vega.Protected Area Effectiveness: What Is It and How to Assess It?[J].Strategies for Sustainability, 2022:31-36.

[17]Dirk Druet. Enhancing the use of digital technology for integrated situational awareness and peacekeeping-intelligence[EB/OL]. https://peacekeeping.un.org/sites/default/files/20210430_-_sa-pki_technologies_research_brief_final_clean.pdf, 2026-02-01.

[18]王方邑,赵智聪,王沛,等.中国自然保护地碳中和贡献的初步评估及三个关键研究课题[J].中国园林,2023,39(03):6-13.

[19]索晓霞. 乡村振兴战略下的乡土文化价值再认识 [J]. 贵州社会科学, 2018, (01): 4-10.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-06

How to Cite

陈., & 江. (2026). 数字鸿沟、乡土文化与自然保护地评价体系重构. Frontiers of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3). Retrieved from http://www.axonpublishing.org/index.php/rwshkqy/article/view/94