先验逻辑的建构与逾越：论康德形而上学革命的深层理路
关键词:
康德；先验逻辑；形而上学革命；理性批判；实践理性；目的论摘要
本文以“先验逻辑”为线索，系统重构康德形而上学革命的深层逻辑。本研究认为，康德的革命不仅是认识论转型，更是通过理性批判重建形而上学的整体形态。先验逻辑在三个阶段发挥关键作用：作为“真理的逻辑”建构内在形而上学；作为“幻相的逻辑”揭示理性越界必然性并解构传统超越形而上学；进而推动形而上学议题向实践理性转移，在目的论体系中实现统一。本文的创新之处在于：以先验逻辑自身的辩证演进为线索，系统阐释康德形而上学革命所具有的内在一致性与阶段性发展特征。研究最终表明，康德借助先验逻辑所展开的“建构—逾越—重构”三重运动，推动了形而上学实现从“对象中心”到“理性中心”的范式转向，从而确立了批判哲学的根本原则，也为后续哲学探讨奠定了核心论域。
参考
[1].Allison, Henry E.Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Revised and Enlarged ed., Yale University Press, 2004.
[2].Longuenesse, Béatrice.Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton University Press, 1998.
[3].Grier, Michelle.Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[4].Ameriks, Karl.Kant's Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. New Edition, Clarendon Press, 2000.
[5].Wood, Allen W.Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[6].Rawls, John.Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Edited by Barbara Herman, Harvard University Press, 2000.
[7].Guyer, Paul. Kant's System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays. Clarendon Press, 2005.
[8].Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[9].Friedman, Michael. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Harvard University Press, 1992.
[10].Pippin, Robert B. The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[11].O’Neill, Onora. “Vindicating Reason.” The Cambridge Companion to Kant, edited by Paul Guyer, Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 280–308.
[12].Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[13].邓晓芒.(2004).康德自由概念的三个层次.复旦学报(社会科学版),(02),24-30.
[14].董一飞.(2024).康德崇高概念在其哲学体系下的意义(硕士学位论文,黑龙江大学).
[15].韩水法.(2024).论康德的先验哲学与形而上学.哲学分析,15(06),3-24.
[16].刘凤娟.(2025).康德哲学的历史性维度.许昌学院学报,44(03),108-115.
[17].孙小玲.(2025).康德的“理性事实”的现象学诠释.现代哲学,(03),130-137.
##submission.downloads##
已出版
##submission.howToCite##
期
栏目
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##For all articles published in Axon Academic Publishing Institute journals, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download, read, reuse, and quote the paper for free, provided that the original published version is cited. This ensures that the work receives maximum use and exposure, while giving proper credit to the authors.
In exceptional circumstances, articles may be licensed differently. If you have specific conditions (such as those related to funding) that prevent using this license, please notify the journal’s editorial office during submission. Exceptions will be considered at the publisher's discretion.
