场域理论视角下美国学术界的北京形象研究:基于文献计量与知识图谱的分析
关键词:
digital courts; credit card disputes; personal information protection; social network analysis摘要
北京形象作为中美关系的缩影和“晴雨表”,生动反映了两个大国之间的“聚散离合、悲喜阴晴”,学术研究作规范性、学理性、科学性(或称理论性、创新性)的“非虚构叙事”更能在相对较为客观、公正、理性的层面上折射出北京在美形象的“光谱”。本研究采用量化文本分析、引文分析结合案例分析法、历史研究法,基于 Web of Science 核心数据库 2153 篇文献,借助HistCite、KH coder等工具绘制知识图谱。经过知识版图的剖析与探讨发现北京形象在美国学术研究中的边缘地位有待提升和改进;研究主题虽丰富但有待于“聚焦”,形成研究“爆破点”和研究合力;学者群体难以摆脱“中华学者主导、中美合作研究”的学术惯习;研究走向上依赖于“重大时事事件”,呈现出节点化的状态而非是“自然延伸”的学术脉络,学理逻辑的依附性与碎片化亟需祛除,形成“由点到面、从面到体”的立体化研究逻辑结构。总之,研究发现美国学界的北京形象研究呈现多元离散、主题涣散、资本偏倚的特征,存在学术自主性不足、研究路径依赖等局限。本研究的理论贡献在于将布尔迪厄场域理论嵌入知识生产的地缘政治语境,揭示中美学术合作背后的权力不对称与话语权分配逻辑,为城市形象的国际学术表征研究提供理论参照与方法借鉴。本研究通过场域理论透镜,揭示了北京形象在美国学术界中呈现模式与结构性特征,并从学术自主性、话语权与知识生产的地缘政治角度提出了批判性反思。
参考
[1].Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity (R. Nice, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[2].Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[3].Danowski, J. A., Yan, B., & Riopelle, K. (2020). A semantic network approach to measuring sentiment. Quality and Quantity, 1-35.
[4].Li, H. (2013). Constraints on knowledge production in China’s communication journals: Ideology, institutional interests, and social guanxi. Communication & Society, 23, 81–112.
[5].Reinhard Köhler, & Sven Naumann. (2008). Quantitative Text Analysis Using L-, F- and T-Segments. Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[6].Zhu, J. J.-H. (2019). The market structure of the internationalization of communication research: From monopoly to competitive oligopoly. Communication & Society, 50, 187–246.
##submission.downloads##
已出版
##submission.howToCite##
期
栏目
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##For all articles published in Axon Academic Publishing Institute journals, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download, read, reuse, and quote the paper for free, provided that the original published version is cited. This ensures that the work receives maximum use and exposure, while giving proper credit to the authors.
In exceptional circumstances, articles may be licensed differently. If you have specific conditions (such as those related to funding) that prevent using this license, please notify the journal’s editorial office during submission. Exceptions will be considered at the publisher's discretion.