超越工具理性：儒家伦理视阈下人工智能赋能职业教育的路径反思
Keywords:
儒家伦理视阈；人工智能；工具理性；职业教育Abstract
人工智能的深度嵌入正在重塑职业教育的运行逻辑，其应用实践在显著提升教学效率与资源配置精准度的同时，也逐渐暴露出主体性弱化、价值单一化与治理失衡等结构性问题。本文以“工具理性”为分析线索，系统考察人工智能赋能职业教育过程中所呈现的内在张力，指出当前技术应用在很大程度上仍停留于手段最优化层面，忽视了职业教育作为“育人实践”的价值根基。文章进一步引入儒家伦理视阈，对这一张力展开规范性反思：通过“仁”的人本关怀，回应技术治理下个体被动化的风险；借助“礼”的制度规范，厘清智能系统介入教育决策的边界；并以“中庸”的调和智慧，重构效率追求与教育本质之间的关系。本文认为，人工智能在职业教育中的合理定位，不应仅作为提升绩效的工具，而应在伦理规约中转化为促进教育正义与人格发展的价值性力量。由此，文章尝试超越单一工具理性逻辑，提出一条以儒家伦理为内在支撑的职业教育智能化路径重构思路，为当前职业教育的数字化转型提供价值导向上的理论校正。
References
[1] 韦伯 M. 经济与社会（上卷）[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1997: 56.
[2] 多德 N. 社会理论与现代化[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2000: 78.
[3] 博尔德. 海德格尔分析新时代的技术[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1993: 17.
[4] 高志宏. 回应与超越: 生成式人工智能法律规制——以《生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法》为视角[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2024(5): 121-130.
[5] 邱耕田, 强竞丹. 应对智能革命的中国方案[J]. 浙江学刊, 2024(6): 115-124.
[6] 国务院. 政府工作报告（2024年3月5日）[EB/OL]. （2024‑03‑05）[2025‑07‑31]. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202403/content_6939153.htm
[7] 中华人民共和国教育部. 2024世界数字教育大会开幕，强调“发展数字教育，关键在应用”[EB/OL]. （2024‑01‑30）[2025‑07‑31]. https://en.moe.gov.cn/features/2024WorldDigitalEducationConference/KeynoteSpeech/202402/t20240201_1113771.html
[8] 郭紫怡. 论人工智能赋能教育的价值理性与工具理性[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2024, 44(31): 24-29.
[9] Hassija V, Chamola V, Mahapatra A, et al. Interpreting black-box models: A review on explainable artificial intelligence[J]. Cognitive Computation, 2024, 16(1): 45–74.
[10] 唐汉卫. 人工智能时代教育将如何存在[J]. 教育研究, 2018(11): 18-24
[11] Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in educational systems: Examining the impact of AI-driven decision making in modern education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(5): 1052–1092.
[12] Wieczorek, C., Sliwka, A., & Schildhauer, T. (2025). Unpacking the Ethics of Using AI in Education: A Systematic Review. AI and Ethics, 6(1): 34–57.
[13] 王佑镁, 王立生, 张晟楠. 全球职业教育领域生成式人工智能的应用场景、风险挑战及对策[J]. 中国职业技术教育, 2025(06): 18-25.
[14] 武汉职业技术学院. 基于大数据和AI驱动的“追光逐电”产教融合平台建设报告[R/OL]. 武汉职业技术学院官网, 2024-11-12. https://www.wtc.edu.cn/info/1020/8872.htm
[15] 重庆交通大学. “Kimi-AI课堂”智能教学实验研究报告[R/OL]. 重庆交通大学新闻中心, 2024-10-09. https://news.cqjtu.edu.cn/info/1081/13925.htm
[16] Mühlhoff, R. (2023). Predictive optimization: The social consequences of algorithmic forecasting in education and beyond[J]. Sustainability, 15(2): 936.
[17] Schunk, D. H., & Bandura, A. (2005). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 40(2): 117–127.
[18] 乌兰察布职业学院. 乌兰察布数字智能产业学院落地揭牌！[EB/OL]. 2024-12-02. https://www.ulvc.edu.cn/info/1034/2443.htm
[19] 赵扬静, 黄慧, 郑凯. 数字校园建设背景下职业教育智能化资源配置的区域差异分析[J]. 现代教育技术, 2023, 33(6): 81-87.
[20] Holstein K, Doroudi S. Equity and Artificial Intelligence in Education: Will “AIEd” Amplify or Alleviate Inequities?[J]. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_20
[21] Schunk D H, Bandura A. Self-efficacy theory in education[J]. Educational Psychology, 2005, 35(3): 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3503_1
[22] Madaio M A, Stark L, Wortman Vaughan J, Wallach H. Co-designing checklists to understand organizational challenges and opportunities around fairness in AI[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2021: 1–14.
[23] 王学典. 古典儒家生活方式与新型东方伦理型生活方式打造[J]. 民俗研究, 2025(2).
[24] Wieczorek C, Sliwka A, Schildhauer T. Unpacking the ethics of using AI in education: A systematic review[J]. AI and Ethics, 2025, 6(1): 34–57.
[25] Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, et al. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Are the ethical dimensions sufficiently addressed?[J]. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2022, 19(1): 1–27.
[26] Holmes W, Porayska-Pomsta K, Holstein K, et al. Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework[J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2022, 32(1): 1–22.
[27] Zhou L. Repositioning the role of teachers in AI-empowered classrooms: A Confucian ethical reflection[J]. Frontiers of Education in China, 2023, 18(2): 134–150.
[28] Sun M, Ye L. Beyond efficiency: Value-oriented AI curriculum in vocational education[J]. Journal of Moral Education and Technology, 2024, 10(1): 41–58.
[29] Chaudhry A, Cukurova M, Luckin R. A transparency index framework for AI in education[J]. AI and Ethics, 2022, 2(4): 815–832.
[30] Xue Y, Chinapah V, Zhu C. A comparative analysis of AI privacy concerns in higher education: News coverage in China and Western countries[J]. Education Sciences, 2025, 15(6): 645-650.
[31] Williamson B, Eynon R, Knox J, et al. Critical perspectives on AI in education: Political economy, discrimination, commercialization, governance and ethics[M]// Du Boulay B, Mitrovic A, Yace K. Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2023: 553–570.
[32] Riordan R, Selwyn N, Nemorin S. Personalisation or prescription? The paradoxes of AI-powered education[J]. Learning, Media and Technology, 2023, 48(2): 159–175.
[33] Peters MA, Green B. Artificial wisdom in AI education: Towards a posthuman epistemology of learning[J]. AI and Society, 2024, 39(1): 77–92.
[34] Peters MA, Green B. Designing ethical AI systems for education: Rethinking the value horizon[C]// Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Ethics and Information Technology. 2024: 102–114.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 闫德宇
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in Axon Academic Publishing Institute journals, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download, read, reuse, and quote the paper for free, provided that the original published version is cited. This ensures that the work receives maximum use and exposure, while giving proper credit to the authors.
In exceptional circumstances, articles may be licensed differently. If you have specific conditions (such as those related to funding) that prevent using this license, please notify the journal’s editorial office during submission. Exceptions will be considered at the publisher's discretion.
